I Shadowed Giovanni.
His experiment was about nitrating toluene using a rare earth catalyst. His research
dealt with the use of an environmentally friendly catalyst using specific aromatic
compounds such as alkyl benzenes. The importance of this research is that
replacing sulfuric acid with ytterbium triflate can have beneficial results in
using less dangerous chemicals and providing minimal chemical waste to the
environment. Nitrating aromatic compounds is important in the industry in
creating dyes, pharmaceuticals, and other industrial products. However,
Giovanni told me that while nitration of the aromatic compounds does occur,
what doesn’t occur is that there seems to not be a high yield of the product.
He told me that the exception was toluene. Now, he wants to test alkybenzenes
and see if they might be only types of arenes that produce more of the desired
product. He’ll do that by testing the electron-donating ability of toluene and
cumene and conclude whether the alkyl group of the aromatic compound influences
the yield in anyway; he says that the bulkier group of cumene will lead to
higher yield recovery.
From
my day of shadowing, I saw him separate the organic layer from the aqueous
layer in the separatory funnel. He told me that the organic layer contains the
desired product while the aqueous layer contains the catalyst that he used in
place of sulfuric acid. He then started to add two washings of diethyl ether
because it separates any remaining organic droplets still present in the
aqueous layer. After the washings occurred, he showed me across his work
station the rotovaporization machine. This machine serves as a vacuum suction
device that dries the product so that the product can be acquired without any
unwanted solution. Giovanni disconnected the flask containing the aqueous layer
from the machine so that it can be reweighted and calculate how much of his
catalyst was regained. He would do the same thing to the flask containing the
organic layer. After the drying of the organic layer, Giovanni will weigh his
flask and calculate how much of his product he has.
That
was all he showed me but we did not get the opportunity for him to show me how
he will identify the product. He mentioned that he will use the IR spectroscopy
machine in the Organic Chemistry lab when it is properly fixed. Overall, I
found my shadowing experience to be interesting. It’s interesting because we
both are dealing with the underlying concept of chemistry however; I am
modeling the chemical reaction while he is doing the actual lab experiment. My
experiment is basically concerned with how we can model the chemical reaction.
I
like his research experiment rather than mine because his research helps to
develop technique for undergraduate students;
however, mine is basically concerned with how to use tools to perform
calculation using Gaussian program. I learned from his experiment that there
are two different ways of doing experiment: one is physical where a researcher
has to handle chemicals and note the change that occurs during experimentation while next one is a
mathematical one where you have to deal with several theories proved by experimental
procedures. I shadowed his experiment because I am familiar with Nitration
reaction and its properties.
Laxman,I have also shadowed Giovanni and I pretty much learn as much new things as you have mentioned in your post. He is really doing a nice job. Shadowing for sure helps us to learn new ideas. So how did you like the idea of shadowing others? Do you think this should be continued?
ReplyDeleteIt's never wrong or right to shadow others.I learned a lot from shadowing Giovanni's project so I always support shadowing. Personally, I recommend shadowing others experiment.
ReplyDelete